GenAICEP

Prompt Examples

Task: Evaluate a presentation or lesson plan.

Short

Does this make sense?

Long

Please analyze this presentation for flow and logic.

Please address all of the following questions. Create a report that addresses each question. When possible, refer to a specific slide or slides.

1. Does it make sense?

2. Are there any changes you'd recommend to the order of the slides?

3. Is there any redundancies?

4. What am I missing?

5. Do you have any other additional ideas for improvements?

Longer (GENAI Help)

PRESENTATION ANALYSIS REQUEST: Comprehensive Structural and Content Evaluation

As an experienced instructional designer and presentation specialist, please conduct a thorough analysis of the attached presentation, focusing on both structural coherence and content effectiveness. Your evaluation should be organized into the following sections with specific, actionable feedback:

I. NARRATIVE FLOW ASSESSMENT
   - Evaluate the logical progression of ideas throughout the presentation
   - Identify any disconnects or abrupt transitions between sections
   - Assess whether the presentation builds a coherent argument or story
   - Determine if the introduction effectively sets expectations and the conclusion provides appropriate closure
   - For any flow issues identified, specify the slide numbers and recommend specific reordering or transitional elements

II. STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION EVALUATION
   - Analyze the hierarchical organization of information (main points vs. supporting details)
   - Identify any slides that appear out of sequence or disrupt the presentation's rhythm
   - Evaluate whether the current slide order optimizes audience comprehension
   - Recommend specific reordering of slides where beneficial, citing slide numbers and rationale
   - Assess whether section breaks or divider slides would improve structural clarity

III. CONTENT REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS
   - Identify any concepts, examples, or visual elements that are unnecessarily repeated
   - Distinguish between intentional reinforcement and unproductive redundancy
   - For each redundancy, specify the slide numbers and recommend consolidation strategies
   - Suggest how recovered space could be better utilized

IV. CONTENT GAP IDENTIFICATION
   - Identify critical information that appears to be missing based on the presentation's stated purpose
   - Note any claims made without sufficient supporting evidence
   - Identify where additional context, examples, or explanations would strengthen the presentation
   - Suggest specific content additions with recommended placement within the existing structure

V. ENHANCEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
   - Suggest 3-5 specific improvements to visual design elements (layout, typography, color, etc.)
   - Recommend 2-3 engagement strategies to increase audience interaction or retention
   - Propose 2-3 clarification techniques for complex information
   - Suggest any relevant updates or contemporary references that would strengthen the content

For each recommendation, please:
1. Reference specific slide numbers when applicable
2. Explain the rationale behind your suggestion
3. Provide a concrete example of how to implement the change
4. Note the expected impact on audience comprehension or engagement

Task: Create a list of newsletter ideas

Short

Generate a list of library newsletter ideas.

Long

I am an academic librarian whose primary functions include teaching college students about the research process, how to evaluate sources, and how to responsibly use Generate AI. Please generate a list of 25 topics that could be included in a monthly newsletter. Each newsletter should focus mostly on a specific information literacy skill. It should also include general topics and events. The primary audience for this newsletter are undergraduate students, with a special focus on college freshmen and those who have underdeveloped information literacy skills.

Longer (GENAI Help)

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST: Academic Library Information Literacy Newsletter Series

As an experienced academic librarian and information literacy specialist at a four-year undergraduate institution, I am developing a strategic content plan for our monthly library newsletter aimed at enhancing student research competencies. I need a comprehensive list of 25 thematic topics that will form the foundation of our year-round information literacy outreach initiative.

TARGET AUDIENCE PROFILE:
- Primary: First-year undergraduate students (Gen Z, ages 18-20)
- Secondary: Upper-class undergraduates with identified information literacy gaps
- Tertiary: Faculty seeking to integrate information literacy into their courses
- Demographic: Diverse student population with varying levels of prior research experience
- Needs Assessment: Many students demonstrate challenges with source evaluation, research process navigation, and responsible AI integration

NEWSLETTER STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS:
Each monthly issue should include recommendations for:
1. A CENTRAL THEME focused on a specific information literacy competency (60% of content)
2. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS of this skill in current coursework contexts (15% of content)
3. SPOTLIGHT on relevant library resources and services (10% of content)
4. UPCOMING EVENTS including workshops and training opportunities (5% of content)
5. QUICK TIPS section for immediate skill application (5% of content)
6. STUDENT SUCCESS STORY highlighting peer implementation (5% of content)

INFORMATION LITERACY FRAMEWORK:
Please align topics with the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, ensuring coverage across these threshold concepts:
- Authority Is Constructed and Contextual
- Information Creation as a Process
- Information Has Value
- Research as Inquiry
- Scholarship as Conversation
- Searching as Strategic Exploration

GENERATIVE AI INTEGRATION:
Each newsletter should incorporate responsible AI usage guidance that:
- Connects to the month's information literacy theme
- Addresses ethical considerations relevant to undergraduate research
- Provides practical prompting strategies for academic contexts
- Clarifies appropriate vs. inappropriate AI applications
- Emphasizes critical evaluation of AI-generated content

CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS:
For each of the 25 topics, please provide:

1. ENGAGING NEWSLETTER TITLE (8-10 words that appeal to undergraduate audience)

2. THEME DESCRIPTION (2-3 sentences explaining the core information literacy concept)

3. RELEVANCE STATEMENT (1-2 sentences connecting to undergraduate academic challenges)

4. KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES (3-4 specific skills students will develop)

5. CONTENT COMPONENTS
   - Main article focus (150-200 word description)
   - 2-3 subtopics for supporting articles
   - Suggested interactive element (quiz, challenge, reflection prompt)
   - Recommended resource highlight (database, tool, or service)

6. AI INTEGRATION ANGLE
   - Specific GenAI application related to the monthly theme
   - Ethical consideration to address
   - Sample effective prompt related to the theme

7. SEASONAL RELEVANCE
   - Optimal timing in academic year (specific month recommendation)
   - Connection to typical undergraduate academic calendar milestones

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
- Ensure topics progress logically through the research process over the academic year
- Include both foundational and advanced information literacy concepts
- Incorporate contemporary digital literacy challenges (misinformation, algorithm awareness, etc.)
- Balance theoretical frameworks with practical, immediately applicable strategies
- Consider attention-grabbing approaches appropriate for digital-native students
- Include assessment opportunities to measure newsletter effectiveness

The final list should provide a comprehensive roadmap for a year of information literacy instruction that supports our institutional learning outcomes while engaging students through relevant, practical content delivered in an accessible format.

Task: Create a list of assignments that use GenAI

Short

Make me a list of assignment ideas on GenAI.

Long

Please generate a list of 5 ideas for an assignment that involves using GenerativeAI. This assignment is for a foundational chemistry course. This assignment should take 30-60 minutes to complete. It should be interesting and offer an engaging androgogical approach. This assignment should be completed alone. You can refer to the syllabus and the textbook https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/588. They must also hand in a copy of their GenAI transcripts.

Longer (GENAI Help)

PROMPT DESIGN REQUEST: Reflective Questions on AI in Higher Education

As an educational researcher specializing in technology integration and academic ethics, please develop a nuanced set of 5 reflective questions exploring the tensions between pro-AI student perspectives and anti-AI faculty positions in higher education contexts. These questions should be designed with the following specifications:

CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK:
- Position these questions within the current higher education landscape where generative AI tools are rapidly transforming academic practices
- Acknowledge the legitimate concerns of faculty (academic integrity, skill development, critical thinking) without demonizing their position
- Recognize the valid perspectives of students (workplace relevance, efficiency, accessibility) without trivializing traditional academic values
- Frame the tension as a complex educational evolution rather than a simple generational divide

QUESTION DESIGN PARAMETERS:
- Create 5 distinct questions that progressively build in complexity and perspective-taking requirements
- Each question should be designed to elicit nuanced, multi-paragraph responses rather than binary positions
- Questions should be suitable for written reflection assignments, seminar discussions, or faculty development contexts
- The collection should balance philosophical inquiry with practical considerations

STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS:
For each of the 5 questions, please provide:

1. THE CORE QUESTION (clearly articulated in 20-30 words)

2. CONTEXTUAL FRAMING (2-3 sentences that establish relevant background and stakes)

3. PERSPECTIVE ELEMENTS
   - A sub-prompt that encourages consideration of faculty concerns
   - A sub-prompt that acknowledges student perspectives
   - A sub-prompt that explores institutional responsibilities

4. THEORETICAL CONNECTIONS
   - Link to relevant educational theories or frameworks
   - Connect to broader questions of pedagogy, assessment, or academic values

5. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
   - Prompt consideration of how responses might inform policy or practice
   - Encourage reflection on implementation challenges or opportunities

CONTENT DISTRIBUTION:
- Question 1: Focus on fundamental definitions and assumptions about learning and knowledge creation
- Question 2: Explore assessment authenticity and meaningful demonstration of learning
- Question 3: Examine workplace preparation and skill development for future careers
- Question 4: Investigate power dynamics and decision-making authority in academic settings
- Question 5: Consider long-term implications for higher education's purpose and value

TONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
- Questions should maintain neutrality while acknowledging the emotional aspects of this debate
- Language should be accessible to both faculty and students without oversimplification
- Avoid loaded terminology that might alienate either perspective
- Frame questions to invite genuine inquiry rather than defensive positioning

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
- Include brief guidance notes for facilitators on how each question might be used
- Suggest potential follow-up questions that could deepen the discussion
- Identify potential resistance points and how to address them constructively
- Ensure questions acknowledge diverse disciplinary contexts across the academy

Multiple Step Prompt

Task: Analyze student responses

STEP 1: Analyze student responses & find themes

STEP 2: Generate a report

STEP 3: Code responses

STEP 4: Create a CVS file

Task: Create a lesson plan

STEP 1: Develop student learning outcomes

STEP 2: Generate a lesson plan

STEP 3: Create a schedule of classes

Task: Create an assignment

STEP 1: Generate assignment ideas

STEP 2: Create assignment instructions

STEP 3: Develop grading rubric

EXERCISE: LLM COMPARISONS

Pick 2 or 3 LLMS and insert this prompt. Compare your responses.

Goal: Evaluate how different LLM's generate logical arguments.

Prompt: If violent crime has decreased while video game sales have increased, then video games must reduce violent behavior.

Goal: Evaluate how different LLM's approach creative tasks.

Prompt: Write a 250-word short story that meets these requirements:

- Set on a farm during the 1800’s

- Includes a mysterious book, an unexpected sound, and a decision

- Written entirely in second-person perspective ("you")

- Each paragraph must be exactly three sentences

Goal: Evaluate how different LLM's manage ethical questions

Prompt: Consider this scenario: A hospital has developed an AI system that predicts which emergency room patients are likely to experience complications, helping doctors prioritize care. The system is 85% accurate overall but has a 25% higher error rate for patients from certain demographic groups.

Analyze this situation from three different ethical frameworks:

1. Utilitarian perspective

2. Rights-based perspective

3. Justice/fairness perspective

EXERCISE: EXPLORE RESEARCH GENAI TOOLS

Practitioners and researchers are encouraged to define cohesion with task and social subdimensions and to measure with behavioral and attitudinal operationalizations. Individual and team-oriented items are recommended, though team-level analyses are most effective. Innovative/unobtrusive methods should be further researched to enable cohesion measurement longitudinally and in large, dynamic collectives.

Identifying splice sites is essential for gene structure analysis and eukaryotic genome annotation. Recently, computational and deep learning approaches for splice site detection have advanced, focusing on reducing false positives by distinguishing true from pseudo splice sites. This paper introduces GraphSplice, a method using graph convolutional neural networks. It encodes DNA sequences into directed graphs to extract features and predict splice sites. Tested across multiple datasets, GraphSplice consistently achieved high accuracy (91%-94%) and F1Scores (92%-94%), outperforming state-of-the-art models by up to 9.16% for donors and 5.64% for acceptors. Cross-species experiments also show GraphSplice’s capability to annotate splice sites in under-trained genomic datasets, proving its wide applicability as a tool for DNA splice site analysis.

EXERCISE: NotebookLM

EXERCISE: CoPilot- Create a powerpoint

PRESENTATION DESIGN REQUEST: "Conquering Decision Fatigue: A Survival Guide for College Freshmen"

As an experienced educational content designer specializing in student success resources, please create a complete PowerPoint presentation (12-15 slides) that teaches first-year college students about decision fatigue and provides practical strategies to overcome it. This presentation will be delivered during freshman orientation week.

AUDIENCE PROFILE:
- First-semester college students (ages 17-19)
- Diverse backgrounds and preparation levels
- Currently experiencing significant life transition with numerous new decisions
- Limited prior knowledge about cognitive psychology concepts
- Attention span appropriate for Gen Z learners (visual, engaging, concise)

PRESENTATION STRUCTURE:
1. ATTENTION-GRABBING OPENER
   - Create a relatable, high-impact opening slide that illustrates the overwhelming number of decisions college freshmen face daily
   - Include a compelling statistic or scenario that resonates with new college students

2. CONCEPT INTRODUCTION (2-3 slides)
   - Define decision fatigue in accessible, non-technical language
   - Explain the science behind willpower depletion using simple visuals
   - Connect to specific college scenarios where students experience this phenomenon

3. IMPACT ASSESSMENT (2-3 slides)
   - Outline the consequences of decision fatigue on:
     * Academic performance
     * Physical and mental wellbeing
     * Social relationships
     * Long-term goal achievement
   - Include concrete examples relevant to freshman year challenges

4. SOLUTION STRATEGIES (4-5 slides)
   - Present 5-7 practical techniques for managing decision fatigue, such as:
     * Decision minimization strategies
     * Routine establishment approaches
     * Environmental modification techniques
     * Digital tool recommendations
     * Energy management practices
   - For each strategy, include:
     * A clear explanation
     * A specific application to college life
     * A simple implementation step to start immediately

5. IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING (1-2 slides)
   - Provide a framework for students to identify their highest-impact decision areas
   - Include a simple template for creating personal decision management systems
   - Suggest metrics for tracking improvement

6. RESOURCES & CONCLUSION (1-2 slides)
   - List campus-specific resources for additional support
   - Summarize key takeaways with an empowering message
   - End with a memorable call to action

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS:
- Use a visually engaging, modern design appropriate for Gen Z audience
- Incorporate relevant icons, illustrations, or memes that resonate with 18-19 year olds
- Limit text to 20-30 words per slide maximum
- Include presenter notes with additional context and talking points
- Use a consistent color scheme that evokes energy and clarity
- Include at least 2-3 interactive elements (polls, reflection questions, pair discussions)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS:
- Language should be conversational, relatable, and jargon-free
- Examples must be specific to freshman year experiences
- Content should acknowledge diversity of student experiences
- Strategies must be immediately implementable with minimal resources
- Information should be evidence-based but presented in accessible ways
- Tone should be empowering rather than prescriptive

ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS:
- Include 1-2 brief activities that demonstrate decision fatigue in action
- Suggest a handout or digital resource students can reference later
- Provide 2-3 discussion questions for small group conversation
- Include a QR code slide linking to additional resources

The final presentation should equip freshmen with both understanding of the concept and practical tools they can immediately apply to reduce decision fatigue during their transition to college life.